Matroid maps
A.V. Borovik, Department of Mathematics, UMIST
1. Notation
This paper continues the works [1,2]
and uses, with some modification, their terminology and notation. Throughout
the paper W is a Coxeter group (possibly infinite) and P a finite standard
parabolic subgroup of W. We identify the Coxeter group W with its Coxeter
complex and refer to elements of W as chambers, to cosets with respect to a
parabolic subgroup as residues, etc. We shall use the calligraphic letter as a notation for the Coxeter
complex of W and the symbol
for the set of left cosets of the
parabolic subgroup P. We shall use the Bruhat ordering on
in its geometric interpretation, as
defined in [2, Theorem 5.7]. The w-Bruhat ordering on
is denoted by the same symbol
as the w-Bruhat ordering on
. Notation
, <w, >w has obvious meaning.
We refer to Tits [6] or Ronan [5] for definitions of chamber systems, galleries, geodesic galleries, residues, panels, walls, half-complexes. A short review of these concepts can be also found in [1,2].
2. Coxeter matroids
If W is a finite Coxeter group, a
subset is called a Coxeter matroid (for W
and P) if it satisfies the maximality property: for every
the set
contains a unique w-maximal element
A; this means that
for all
. If
is a Coxeter matroid we shall refer
to its elements as bases. Ordinary matroids constitute a special case of
Coxeter matroids, for W=Symn and P the stabiliser in W of the set
[4]. The maximality property in this
case is nothing else but the well-known optimal property of matroids first
discovered by Gale [3].
In the case of infinite groups W we need to slightly modify the definition. In this situation the primary notion is that of a matroid map
i.e. a map satisfying the matroid inequality
The image of
obviously satisfies the maximality
property. Notice that, given a set
with the maximality property, we can
introduce the map
by setting
be equal to the w-maximal element of
. Obviously,
is a matroid map. In infinite
Coxeter groups the image
of the matroid map associated with a
set
satisfying the maximality property
may happen to be a proper subset of
(the set of all `extreme' or
`corner' chambers of
; for example, take for
a large rectangular block of
chambers in the affine Coxeter group
). This never happens, however, in
finite Coxeter groups, where
.
So we shall call a subset a matroid if
satisfies the maximality property
and every element of
is w-maximal in
with respect to some
. After that we have a natural
one-to-one correspondence between matroid maps and matroid sets.
We can assign to every Coxeter
matroid for W and P the Coxeter matroid for
W and 1 (or W-matroid).
Теорема 1. [2, Lemma 5.15] A map
is a matroid map if and only if the map
defined by is also a matroid map.
Recall that denotes the w-maximal element in the
residue
. Its existence, under the
assumption that the parabolic subgroup P is finite, is shown in [2, Lemma
5.14].
In is a matroid map, the map
is called the underlying flag
matroid map for
and its image
the underlying flag matroid for the
Coxeter matroid
. If the group W is finite then
every chamber x of every residue
is w-maximal in
for w the opposite to x chamber of
and
, as a subset of the group W, is
simply the union of left cosets of P belonging to
.
3. Characterisation of matroid maps
Two subsets A and B in are called adjacent if there are two
adjacent chambers
and
, the common panel of a and b being
called a common panel of A and B.
Лемма 1. If A and B are two adjacent
convex subsets of then all their common panels belong
to the same wall
.
We say in this situation that is the common wall of A and B.
For further development of our theory we need some structural results on Coxeter matroids.
Теорема 2. A map is a matroid map if and only if the
following two conditions are satisfied.
(1) All the fibres ,
, are convex subsets of
.
(2) If two fibres and
of
are adjacent then their images A and
B are symmetric with respect to the wall
containing the common panels of
and
, and the residues A and B lie on
the opposite sides of the wall
from the sets
,
, correspondingly.
Доказательство. If is a matroid map then the
satisfaction of conditions (1) and (2) is the main result of [2].
Assume now that satisfies the conditions (1) and
(2).
First we introduce, for any two
adjacent fibbers and
of the map
, the wall
separating them. Let
be the set of all walls
.
Now take two arbitrary residues and chambers
and
. We wish to prove
.
Consider a geodesic gallery
connecting the chambers u and v. Let
now the chamber x moves along from u to v, then the corresponding
residue
moves from
to
. Since the geodesic gallery
intersects every wall no more than
once [5, Lemma 2.5], the chamber x crosses each wall
in
no more than once and, if it crosses
, it moves from the same side of
as u to the opposite side. But, by
the assumptions of the theorem, this means that the residue
crosses each wall
no more than once and moves from the
side of
opposite u to the side containing u.
But, by the geometric interpretation of the Bruhat order, this means [2,
Theorem 5.7] that
decreases, with respect to the
u-Bruhat order, at every such step, and we ultimately obtain
Список литературы
Borovik A.V., Gelfand I.M. WP-matroids and thin Schubert cells on Tits systems // Advances Math. 1994. V.103. N.1. P.162-179.
Borovik A.V., Roberts K.S. Coxeter groups and matroids, in Groups of Lie Type and Geometries, W. M. Kantor and L. Di Martino, eds. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 1995 (London Math. Soc. Lect. Notes Ser. V.207) P.13-34.
Gale D., Optimal assignments in an ordered set: an application of matroid theory // J. Combinatorial Theory. 1968. V.4. P.1073-1082.
Gelfand I.M., Serganova V.V. Combinatorial geometries and torus strata on homogeneous compact manifolds // Russian Math. Surveys. 1987. V.42. P.133-168.
Ronan M. Lectures on Buildings - Academic Press. Boston. 1989.
Tits J. A local approach to buildings, in The Geometric Vein (Coxeter Festschrift) Springer-Verlag, New York a.o., 1981. P.317-322.
Для подготовки данной работы были использованы материалы с сайта http://www.omsu.omskreg.ru/